Contracts, not insolvency
Sometimes the problem is not how much you owe. It is the contract.
Not every debt problem needs an insolvency procedure. Where a credit card or a short-term loan was sold at a cost that was never properly explained, Spanish courts have been annulling those contracts — and the money paid above the capital borrowed goes back to the consumer.
What we are talking about
Three products that show up again and again.
-
Revolving credit cards
A card with a fixed monthly payment that is deliberately low. Interest is charged on the outstanding balance and added back to it, so the debt can stay alive for years while the balance barely moves. Often sold in a shop, at a petrol station or over the phone.
-
Quick loans and microcredits
Small amounts, very short terms, granted in minutes and with the option to extend the due date for a fee. Extending is cheap to do and expensive to accumulate, which is why they rarely appear alone.
-
Store and car finance with extras
Finance agreements with payment protection insurance, extended warranties or life cover added to the amount financed — so you pay interest on them for the whole term.
What can be challenged
Two separate routes, and they are not the same.
Most English-language content about this only describes the first one, which is the older and narrower of the two. The second is where the law has moved.
-
Usury: the interest is far above the market
A Spanish statute from 1908 allows a loan to be annulled where the interest is notably higher than the normal rate for that product and manifestly disproportionate. The Supreme Court has set the comparison against the average rate for that specific product at the time of signing, and treats a gap of more than six percentage points as notably higher. If the annulment succeeds, you repay only the capital you actually received; everything paid above that is returned.
-
Transparency: the contract never explained it
In January 2025 the Supreme Court annulled revolving card contracts for lack of transparency, regardless of whether the rate was usurious. The question is whether an ordinary consumer could have understood, before signing, how the balance recomposes itself and what it would end up costing. This route is wider than usury, and it is the one that has changed most.
-
Products you did not ask for
Insurance added to a loan must be offered in a way you can understand, and you must be able to decline it. Where it was presented as a condition of getting the finance, or its cost was simply added to the capital without explanation, that part of the contract is worth reviewing.
None of this means every card can be challenged. It means there are two different tests, and a contract that passes one may not pass the other. Which applies to yours can only be said after reading it.
Questions
What people ask about cards and quick loans.
- I signed in Spanish and my Spanish was not good at the time. Does that help?
It is relevant, though not decisive on its own. The transparency test asks whether the information allowed an ordinary consumer to understand the real economic burden of the contract. How the product was sold, what was handed to you beforehand and whether the mechanism was explained all form part of that. Language is one circumstance among several, and it is worth mentioning rather than leaving out.
- I already paid the card off. Is it too late?
Not necessarily, and this surprises most people. If a contract is annulled, the effect is restitution: what you paid above the capital you actually used should come back to you. Someone who paid a card for years before cancelling it may well have paid a great deal more than they borrowed. How far back a claim can reach depends on the circumstances and needs looking at case by case.
- How do I know if my card is a revolving one?
Look at the monthly statement rather than the name of the card. The signs are a fixed monthly payment that does not change when you spend more, a balance that hardly falls, and an APR — TAE in Spanish — well above a normal consumer loan. If the balance has stayed roughly the same for a year while you kept paying, it is almost certainly revolving.
- What do you need from me?
The contract and any pre-contract documentation, the statements or transaction history, and the exact date the card or loan was taken out — that date determines the rate it has to be compared against. If you no longer have them, the bank is obliged to provide them and you can request them yourself.
- Should I do this or the Second Chance Law?
They are different things and they are not mutually exclusive. If your income covers your living costs once one or two expensive contracts are set aside, the problem is those contracts. If it does not, the problem is the whole picture and a claim on one card will not fix it. Often the answer is both, and the order matters.
You can write to us in English on WhatsApp or call +34 684 742 105.